Peer Review Process

The "Interdisciplinary Design and Engineering Journal" employs a rigorous peer review process to ensure the quality, integrity, and credibility of the research published in the journal. The peer review process is an essential component of scholarly publishing, serving as a mechanism for evaluating the scientific merit, methodological rigor, and contribution of submitted manuscripts.

Submission and Initial Evaluation: Upon submission, manuscripts undergo an initial evaluation by the editorial team to ensure adherence to the journal's submission guidelines and scope. Manuscripts that meet the basic criteria are then assigned to qualified reviewers with expertise in the relevant subject area.

Expert Reviewers: Reviewers are selected based on their expertise, academic credentials, and experience in the field. They provide independent and unbiased evaluations of the manuscript's content, methodology, originality, and significance. Reviewers may offer constructive feedback, suggestions for improvement, and recommendations for the manuscript's suitability for publication.

Blind Peer Review: The peer review process is typically conducted in a double-blind manner, where the identities of both the authors and the reviewers are kept confidential. This ensures objectivity and impartiality in the evaluation process, minimizing the potential for bias or conflicts of interest.

Evaluation Criteria: Reviewers assess manuscripts based on predetermined evaluation criteria, which may include the clarity and coherence of the research objectives, the soundness of the methodology, the validity of the results, the significance of the findings, and the overall contribution to the field. Reviewers may also evaluate the manuscript's adherence to ethical standards and compliance with relevant guidelines.

Reviewer Feedback: Reviewers provide detailed feedback and recommendations to the authors, highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement. Authors are encouraged to carefully consider reviewer comments and revise their manuscripts accordingly to address any concerns raised during the review process.

Editorial Decision: Based on the feedback from reviewers, the editor-in-chief or editorial board makes an editorial decision regarding the manuscript. Possible decisions include acceptance, acceptance with minor revisions, major revisions and resubmission, or rejection. The decision is communicated to the authors along with the reviewers' comments and recommendations.

Revision and Resubmission: If revisions are required, authors are given the opportunity to revise their manuscripts in accordance with the reviewers' feedback and the journal's guidelines. Revised manuscripts undergo further evaluation to ensure that the concerns raised during the initial review have been adequately addressed.

Final Acceptance: Manuscripts that successfully address reviewers' comments and meet the journal's standards for quality and scholarship are accepted for publication. Accepted manuscripts are then prepared for publication, including copyediting, typesetting, and formatting, before being published in the journal.

The peer review process plays a crucial role in upholding the quality and credibility of scholarly research published in the "Interdisciplinary Design and Engineering Journal." By engaging expert reviewers and adhering to rigorous evaluation criteria, the journal ensures that only high-quality, original, and impactful research contributes to advancing knowledge and understanding within the field of interdisciplinary design and engineering.